Posted in Eleanor Cawley, M.S., OTR/L

So Why Should Occupational Therapists Bother to Write Rubrics?

Mostly, therapists read my posts on social media and then move on. Some comment positively and others, not at all. But then there are those times when there  is that one person who challenges you. I must say, that one person tends to get my fight on! I feel that I have to prove my work all over again. But I really love the debate. To those of you who feel that rubrics are not necessary, that’s okay. However, I feel they are.
Rubrics have been around for a very long time. During my research for my book, “Using Rubrics to Monitor Outcomes in Occupational Therapy“I found that rubrics actually began not in the educational field but in the medical field, decades ago. I feel that rubrics were lost in the shuffle in part due to the changes in the provider/client relationship, moving from power over to power with and ultimately to power through our clients. Now that we are searching for ways to become more ‘client-centered’ as a profession, I feel that transparent, understandable documentation is the key.

It has always been our premise, as occupational therapists, to have our clients engaged in purposeful activity. With the increasing intrusion of third-party payment systems into what we do with our clients and the struggle to become ‘client-centered’ having a method of recording progress becomes increasingly important. Yes, of course, we need to get paid for our work but we also have an obligation to our clients, any one receiving our services.

We all have those people, who question what we do.  I am sure that each and every one of us has had this experience.  Sometimes we can explain what is going on, through statements based on clinical knowledge, but then there are other times that we need real data.  Some challengers will accept the “+” or “-” system of data collection [“+” yes the client was able to perform the task or “-” no the client was not able to perform the task]  while


My Book Cover2
Enter a caption

others want more information.

So rubrics offer us a method of documenting some of our thought processing with regard to critical thinking, clinical reasoning and judgment. Sharing rubrics with clients and caregivers provides them with a tool to engage them in the treatment process in a way that is greater than just sharing goals.  By encouraging clients to monitor their own progress they become more vested, more engaged and more accountable to themselves and to us, their service providers, ultimately leading to greater gains.

Rubrics may be initially time-consuming to learn and to write, just like any other skill, the experienced therapist will soon be developing rubrics a lightening speed and have at their disposal a wealth of data and documentation supporting our services.  In my humble opinion, if a therapist chooses to use or not to use rubrics, it is okay, it’s their decision.  I choose to use rubrics, engage my clients in progress monitoring, and have data specifically highlighting the client’s progress.  In my opinion, how can I expect my clients to make the best progress if I do not share my expectations with them. I feel that I empower my clients through the use of rubrics, because I want to, not because I have to.



Posted in Eleanor Cawley, M.S., OTR/L

Revisiting The Student Interview

The Student Interview CoverAI have worked with middle and high school students most often.  At this age, a student’s frustrations increase proportionally to the workload.  They are aware of what works and what does not work for them.  When frustrations run so high and parents begin to panic, it is at this time other professionals, advocate and lawyers, become involved.

The Student Interview was developed because of a number of school-based cases that I had been involved in were quite intense.  Every small detail of the case was explored in depth.  I felt that it was imperative that the student have a voice and that I had a document that asked all the right questions. While it is very sad to see the state of the educational system, as it is right now, I feel that the educational system is in transition.  There are always ups and downs when experiencing a transition.

Over the last few years, I have used this interview with many students.  Since this is a form to complete, it is good experience for a student in the transition process.  There is a variety of questions, relevant to the student’s educational, vocational and self-care needs.  Some questions require a yes or no response, while others are open-ended and call for more detail.  The Student Interview serves its intended purpose quite nicely. Since using The Student Interview, I have not had that “uh oh” moment when something comes up that I should be aware of.  At least nothing that I have not at least asked and have a response to.

I really love a student’s surprise when he or she is asked to complete the satisfaction survey.  This is often the very first time a student is asked for his or her opinion on services.  I, now, provide each student with this interview.  I find it an invaluable tool not only as written documentation but also as a basis for a deeper conversation regarding a student’s skills, and their perceptions of themselves.


Posted in Eleanor Cawley, M.S., OTR/L

The Can of Worms is Open!-Building Blocks Missing

I am, in many ways, so grateful for this past year.  I have gone from a caterpillar to a butterfly, so to speak.  I have been so grateful for having the opportunity to collaborate with occupational therapists from all over the world and learn so much.  I am excited about the possibilities for learning from social media and currently sad to see the state it is in.

I was communicating with Katherine [Handwriting with Katherine] and we were discussing my last blog, ‘Does Backpack Safety Awareness go far Enough?’  I really just expressed a lot of my own opinions, but isn’t that one of the privileges of having a blog? In my opinion, one of the major issues, understanding the importance of developing all the blocks before constructing the building.  One of my pet projects, as if you didn’t know, is taking notes.  There is often a recommendation for assistive technology when what is really needed is more building blocks.  As occupational therapists know, good handwriting is built on quite a number of those building blocks; posture, visual perceptual/motor skills, functional pencil grip, enough muscle strength and endurance to maintain the writing task for as long as is needed, integration of primitive reflexes, etc.  All of these skills are building blocks that lead to good handwriting, and there are many more.

I am often amazed at how a student could come to me in the 7th grade with poor handwriting skills but missing vital building blocks.  The response often is to get him to take notes on the computer.  The first thing that comes to my mind is, “Well if he can’t take handwritten notes, what makes you think he can miraculously take notes on a keyboard?”  Posture, visual tracking, listening, responding to prompts, formatting the page, keyboarding, etc are all part of taking notes.   I am thinking of one student in particular, 12 years old, in OT since early intervention, who still did not have legible handwriting.  I observed this student in class and in the therapy room [or should I say therapy closet].  I was shocked beyond belief!  What I saw was the residual Asymmetric Tonic Neck Reflex [ATNR] in all its glory.  Of course, I could report my findings, but not make a recommendation to visit a neurologist [district policy].  Any way, this student exhibited classic signs of a residual ATNR.  He was right handed, but left foot and eye dominant.  He tested positive for an ATNR in quadruped. When hand writing, he sat on his left leg with his left arm flexed with his head tilted tilted slightly downward and turned to the right. Basically, reading with his left eye. Using a thumb wrap pencil grasp, he was able to write, but as he moved away from midline, he had difficulty retaining his grip on the pencil.  His grip was so tight, I could not pull the pencil from his hand without having him topple over.  He was so involved in maintaining control of his body that he failed to learn the listening skills, visual tracking skills, and all the other skills needed for effective note-taking.

Teachers have been complaining for years about his handwriting.  He was able to type with both elbows tight against his body but unable to type and read from copy placed to either side as any slight head turn would trigger the ATNR.  Any visual tracking to left or right of midline triggered the response. Was he aware of what was happening to him? Did anyone teach him different strategies? One of the first things that I did with him was to encourage him to write with the paper placed in landscape rather than portrait.  This way he was always writing at midline.   He was asked to sit further back in the classroom so that he did not have to turn his head to see the board.  He was asked to work this way as we continued to work on integrating the ATNR. Here is a link to Lisa Fass, OTR/L and her videos on using Yoga to integrate the ATNR   [Yoga Poses for Primitive Reflex Integration]. This student has made some progress in improving his handwriting and in integrating the ATNR.


Every baby is born with primitive reflexes which are often integrated in the first few months of life.   I chose this picture of the ATNR because it shows both the upper and lower extremity responses to head turning. As you can see, the arm and the leg on the side to which the head is turned are outstretched.  The opposite arm and leg are bent-a sword fighting position.    Some babies, when pushing down on the foot of bent leg and reaching with the arm on the same side, it can help the baby learn to roll from supine [on his or her back] to prone [on his or her tummy].  Again, this is why tummy time is so important to development.  Lisa’s video of integrating the ATNR is working in prone [tummy time].

Some therapist’s feel that once a child gets past the age of nine and the age of rapid changes in neuroplasticity, no amount of therapy will address integration of primitive reflexes.  So maybe the jury is still out on this one.  What I do know is this:  therapists working is school districts need more than a closet to address many of the needs of their students; good mats and equipment should be provided by the school district; therapists need to be able to spot all the signs for deficits in handwriting; therapists need to be able to make recommendations “from one parent to another” or “personally, I would…”  I am not sure how this went on for so long.  But it did and now this student is stuck in limbo with poor handwriting, just learning about why his handwriting is so poor and what he can do for himself.

Posted in New Beginings

Is Occupational Therapy Overused?

I recently read an article from the New York Times that appeared several years ago about parents in New York City, particularly in Brooklyn, hiring occupational therapists for preschool children.  The article states, “In affluent neighborhoods in and around New York, occupational therapists have taken their place next to academic tutors, psychologists, private coaches and personal trainers — the army that often stands behind academically successful students.” (TYRE, 2010)  There were 115 comments attached to this article, many commenting on overly anxious parents or parents pushing their children to get an edge.  Others commented on how observant some parents are, noticing small problems, and addressing problems early on.  Any of these comments may or may not be true.  What I do know is this, if small issues are not addressed early on, they can and often will become major issues later on and more difficult to address.

Children develop at different rates.  There is never a distinct day or time that your child will do something.  Take for example, walking.  According to the CDC, your child should be walking independently by 18 months.  Yet we have seen children walk at 10 months and 12 months.  Does that mean that your child is motorically gifted?  Probably not.  So from this we can assume that there is at least a range of time in a child’s life when we should expect a child to begin walking.  Once outside this range, we should be asking questions of the doctor.

This range of development occurs within fine motor skills, as well.  The CDC lists many of these items under the heading of Cognitive (learning, thinking, problem-solving).  Under this heading are motor skills that an occupational therapist would address, such as using one hand more than the other (handedness), sorting, pointing (finger isolation), stacking (eye-hand coordination), throwing a ball, copying lines, etc.  All of these items are listed in the 2 year old section of their developmental checklist.  What is also listed in this checklist is when to be concerned and talk with your doctor.

Now look at the flip side of this issue, gaining an edge.  I was speaking with a colleague, a psychologist, at lunch the other day.  I had been considering writing on just this topic for my next blog post.  We both agree that there is a range in which a child should accomplish developmental milestones.  We also agree that pushing a child may backfire and frustrate the child because the brain may not be ready.  The brain will help a child accomplish a task when the brain is developed enough to handle the task.  While the basic structures are present at birth, the experiences [motor, cognitive, sensory] that a child has along with the actual physiological maturation of the brain further develop to increase the speed, efficiency, and complexity of signals in the brain which then allows the child to accomplish more difficult tasks.  In a fairly typically developing child, when the brain is ready, the task will occur and not before.

So as an occupational therapist, I might work on hand strengthening and finger isolation to help a young child to eventually develop a tripod grasp for a crayon.  Let’s just say that this did not occur adequately before kindergarten.  It may not be such an issue this year but when a student is challenged to keep pace with his or her peers in handwriting in subsequent years, it most definitely will.  Reaching middle school with handwriting problems just compounds the already difficult tasks, of taking notes at the same pace with peers, and writing legibly to express what they have learned.   Can you imagine, knowing that your child studied and knew this information but failed the test because his teacher was unable to read what was written?

Can you imagine thinking that your child is brilliant at an early age because he or she is ambidextrous? But in fact, has not developed a preferred hand which may be an early indicator of dyslexia.  Is it a sure sign of dyslexia?  No.  Only someone skilled in child development can determine if this is a problem or not.

So, I recommend that parents use the CDC Act Early Checklist to monitor a child’s development.  Keep in touch with your doctor and if concerned, ask the pediatrician to evaluate your child.  An occupational therapy evaluation does not require a prescription but services do.  Progress reports should be expected and shared with the pediatrician.

Acting early, helps your child be as successful as he or she can possibly be.  Once in school, having a child pulled from class for therapy can be embarrassing and frustrating.  He or she may be very receptive to services when young but very resistive when in a school setting, particularly middle and high school.  I have developed programming to address these needs.  We offer a free 30 telephone consult for any questions or concerns.   631-629-4699


TYRE, P. (2010, February 24). Watch How You Hold That Crayon. Retrieved from N.Y. Times: